Once in a blue moon (perhaps full moon is more accurate) I’ll have what I believe to be a novel, original idea only to discover it’s not only unoriginal, but there’s actually been a fair amount of research and development in the field! That’s why, after being inspired by some of the concepts in Eric Sanderson’s talk at the TED conference, I wasn’t surprised to find a wealth of information on the field of Vertical Agriculture within a few clicks of a quick Google search (I labeled my concept “Parking-Garage Agriculture”, but perhaps “vertical” is a more suitable adjective).
In essence, the idea of vertical farming is to stack multiple farms on top of each other (much in the way that parking garages stack multiple parking lots on top of each other) and house them under one building (think Arcologies in Sim City 2000, but exclusively for agriculture). Obviously an ecosystem is not as easy to maintain as a parking garage, but I believe through the use of greenhouse technology and advancements in optical systems that can focus and distribute natural daylight, that this idea may not be so far-fetched.
And why not? From a social acceptance perspective, we’ve already seen the introduction of green roofs to the urban architecture scene (including such backyard examples as the Vancouver Convention Centre). Vancouver is a perfect example of a city that is restricted from outward growth by both mountains and ocean – but there is plenty of room to build upward and to displace our green space (rather than eliminate it). Furthermore, by hosting multiple levels of plant-life we actually have the opportunity to increase the amount of green space in our cities.
From an engineering perspective, controlling the environment in which our crops live would allow us to better predict their behaviour and design more compact, automated farming systems. And with structural advancements that have allowed for the creation of such buildings as the Burj Dubai, it’s not hard to believe that the weight of several farms and their support systems could be supported.
The field is relatively new, but I am already a huge fan. I see potentially opportunities to improve our wasteful water consumption practices (through recycling and re-use of gray water for irrigation), become more self-sufficient and perhaps improve our air-quality while we’re at it. The ‘farmscrapers’ are coming, start building up an appetite.
Parking Garage Agriculture
29 10 2009Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Agriculture, Architecture, Farmscraper, Green Space
Categories : Uncategorized
Decentralizing our Infrastructure
18 10 2009Recently I read Ray Kurzweil’s “The Singularity is Near.” Kurzweil, a reputable futurist, takes the reader through his vision for a future in which machines overcome human intelligence, recursively redesigning themselves in an “intelligence explosion” known as the singularity (don’t be afraid, the machines don’t overtake the human race, we become the machines). Kurzweil predicts that ongoing advancements in the fields of genetics, nanotechnology and robotics will lead us into (and beyond) the singularity. These advancements raise questions about the energy and infrastructure required to support our ongoing technological development and increasing population. One of the themes revisited throughout the book is sustainment through massive decentralization of our infrastructure.
Decentralization is the localization of services currently administered through large hubs – think power plants, industrial agriculture, and water treatment centres. Given our state of technology, it has historically made sense to keep these systems centralized; however they are susceptible to a number of dangers. Recall the immense blackout of North America’s eastern seaboard in the summer of 2003, caused by the shutdown of a generating station in Eastlake, Ohio. While electrical power IS distributed through a grid, the generators are large nodes on which we are very dependent. Ideally individual households could act as generating stations, connected through a self-organizing, self-repairing network not unlike the brain. Of course, this level of decentralization is not yet possible (we would need the ability to more efficiently harness the sun’s energy, while mitigating factors – from noise to meltdowns – that currently keep our power plants and treatment centres away from home), however it does provoke interesting discussion about the benefits of decentralized resources – namely decreased dependence on individual nodes.
Consider cloud computing – Amazon is just one example of a company now offering this service having realized they could put their otherwise idle servers to use outside of the busy holiday shopping season. Instead of hosting files on one computer, Amazon keeps your information on a network of computers. If, for some reason, one server were to catch fire and become irreversibly damaged, never fear! Your information is safely stored around the world. And because the Internet is quite adept at finding new paths around damaged nodes, you probably wouldn’t notice that a fire had happened at all.
Can principles of self-organizing networks be applied to resource and infrastructure problems? I think they can with a little effort. Maybe the Jetsons weren’t so far off in their depiction of the future home. There may be a market for faucet-sized water treatment devices, solar-generating windows, and green-roof vegetable gardens. The Internet could be the platform to support this development. Let’s get this singularity moving people!
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Cloud computing, Decentralization, Energy, Infrastructure, Resources, Singularity
Categories : Uncategorized
The Light Switch: A Dim Spot on the Symbol of Innovation
17 10 2009The light bulb has long been a symbol for innovation. Think back to the roadrunner cartoons where Wile. E. Coyote would have his “Eureka!” moment as he realized he could paint a tunnel at the base of a cliff in hopes of fooling some full-tilt fowl – on goes the light above his head. This implicit tribute to Thomas Edison’s (arguably Sir Humphry Davy’s) famous invention is ingrained in our culture. It is easily one of the most important inventions of the 1800s, and while there has been a constant cycle of innovation to better the design of the bulb, little effort has gone into improving the interface. With the exception of the ill-fated ‘clapper’ of the 1980s we are still slaves to light-switches. This is hardly a sufficient tribute to such an iconic invention. In a world which has produced wireless remote controls for TV’s and stereos, automatic thermostats to control the temperature of our homes, and mobile phones with infrared ports and numerous available antennas, why on earth do we still lumber over to the wall to set the mood?
While I’m not rushing out to buy a clapper (I did own one in my last year of university and found it to be novel but ineffective) I am eagerly awaiting some smarter interfaces to control our light (one of the sources that tends to suck up a fair bit of our home energy consumption). DIY’ers unite – this is a great forum to throw some sensors around the house, hack your phones, remotes and media centres and come up with something great. When you’ve got the IP secured don’t forget to share the love.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: DIY, Electric light, Invention
Categories : Uncategorized
I’ve moved!
17 10 2009I’ve moved my blog to WordPress! I will be back-loading posts from my blogger site, and will soon be hosting on http://gregfitzgerald.ca/blog, stay tuned.
Comments : 1 Comment »
Categories : Uncategorized